Brian Mathis wrote: > On 8/2/07, Jay Lee <jlee at pbu.edu> wrote: > [...] >> CentOS 5 is a .0 release, you might be better served using CentOS 4.5 >> which has had much more tme to prove itself as a DNS Server. > [...] >> Jay > > Please don't propagate this idea. That is very "Windows wait for > service pack 1" way of thinking. Actually it is an 'old' Red Hat way of thinking from the pre-fedora era and was very much true for RH versions up though 7.x. > Linuxes actually go through > extensive pre-release public beta testing, the kind of stuff Microsoft > does on its .0 releases. I'd say "Enterprise Linux distributions" there. It's not true for all or even most Linux distributions. > When a new CentOS release lands, it has > landed. Yes, Centos qualifies as an enterprise version. Plus something like DNS will be fixed immediately if any problems are noticed - long before an x.1 update. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com