[CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1

Clint Dilks clintd at scms.waikato.ac.nz
Wed Dec 12 03:12:04 UTC 2007


Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
>   
>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>     
>>> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps?  Just a guess.
>>>> If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
>>>> see what it's doing?
>>>> Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
>>>> executable, which should be easy to fix.
>>>>
>>>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> All....
>>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system.  The Esker
>>>>> staff have been helpful but no cigar.
>>>>>
>>>>> At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
>>>>> so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
>>>>> the same error.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
>>>>> eula which fails.  
>>>>>
>>>>>  ./eula: cannot execute binary file
>>>>>
>>>>> The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
>>>>> Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.  
>>>>>
>>>>> I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
>>>>> listening to this list and could give me a hand.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks much!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Greg Ennis
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>> The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
>>> installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails.  In
>>> looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
>>> like a binary executable file.  I tried to execute the file manually and
>>> received the same error :
>>>
>>> [root at MailIn install]# ./eula
>>> -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
>>>
>>> The file is executable :
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1  227  105 374644 Apr 19  2007 eula
>>>
>>> The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
>>> ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D
>>> ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G  ^@j
>>> ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@   î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G  ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^\<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T|  ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^\,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help!!
>>>
>>> Greg
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS at centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Hi,
>> What information is returned when you type file eula ?
>>
>>
>>     
>
> typing in ./eula returns
> -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
>
> I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the
> results.  I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system
> different than EL5 Linux.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>   
Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on 
one of my systems if I type

file /usr/bin/pstree

/usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 
(SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped





More information about the CentOS mailing list