[CentOS] "yum --security" and staying with 5.0
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.org
Wed Dec 12 13:22:10 UTC 2007
Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 12/12/2007, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
>> Amos Shapira wrote:
>>> Context - I'd like to stick to 5.0 at least for a while until the dust
>>> around 5.1 settles down (and I'm back from holidays).
>> ok, so what do you mean by sticking to 5.0 ? you mean you dont want any
>> updates at all for those machines, even if they might be security issues ?
>
> (I also replied to David's message)
>
> No. I'm trying to understand where does 5.0 stand now that 5.1 is out
> - should I abandon 5.0 and upgrade to 5.1 if I want to stick to
> secure, stable releases or is 5.0 going to be maintained in parallel
> to 5.0 for security issues?
I think your confusion comes from the fact that you consider 5.1 to be a
new release, and not what it really is : 5.0 + updates + some bug fix's.
I suggest you read up on how the whole EL codebase moves.
> I now noticed the last sentence saying "you are in the update release
> stream for the 5.1 series and you will not move to a newer release
> without making changes to the yum config.". What kind of changes does
> this refer to? Overriding the $releasever in the repository URL's to
> hard-coded "5.0" or what?
no, when branches are created - they will involve you installing a new
centos-release rpm.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
More information about the CentOS
mailing list