[CentOS] Re: "yum --security" and staying with 5.0
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgThu Dec 13 19:11:35 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: "yum --security" and staying with 5.0
- Next message: [CentOS] "yum --security" and staying with 5.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Silva wrote: > If you wanted to re-install every 12 to 18 months, you might as well use > Fedora! This just seems to go "bass ackwards" to what an enterprise > distro means. I guess RedHat is just trying to play to a bigger audience > to maybe boost their revenue stream a bit, which I don't fault them for, > because a business needs to be in the black to stay open. you would only get onto that situation of reinstall or major upgrade every 18 months or so, if you kept getting into the release branches. Which, honestly, I dont imagine most people will want to do. If you stay with CentOS-5, you are fine for the normal 7 to 11 years support cycle. Which is how CentOS always worked as. yes, the situation is somewhat confusing, however, thats only for the people who want to break their distro or do their own branching. For everyone else, its business as usual. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: "yum --security" and staying with 5.0
- Next message: [CentOS] "yum --security" and staying with 5.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list