Christopher Chan wrote: > Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote: >> Christopher Chan wrote: >>> Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> A draft with results of my benchmark based on fsbench is available >>>> in http://www.htiweb.inf.br/benchmark/fsbench.htm. >>>> >>>> The methodology and the conclusion i will publish later, however, >>>> it shows that the XFS obtained better performance and EXT3 had >>>> results that can now compete in this environment. >>> >>> Thank you very much Heitor. May I trouble you to publish the files >>> that fsbench outputs or at least the summary files? >>> >> Ok Christopher, now the tests are available for download on site. >> >> Any suggestions you may have to improve this benchmark are much >> appreciated. >> > > Well...creating graphs like the ones Bruce made would be nice... > > I am writing an awk script to pull out the averages from the summary > file. I already have the reader times done, all I need to do is get > the averages for the writers and then calculate the deliveries per > second for the different number of writers being invoked. > I agree and thank you if send me the average values or even the graphs. Any suggestions to publish the results? wiki.centos.org? > One thing that I do have in mind due to curiosity is what ext3j would > look like... > Ok, I added the log for ext3j in file log.tar.gz available on site. Heitor A. M. Cardozo