> ext3 again takes the slowest performing title overall as expected...in > fact it appears not much as changed fs vs fs wise since Bruce Guenter's > tests. But I am surprised at the overall performance regressions in > comparison to 2.6.5/6 kernels with regards to deliveries vs amount of > writers. Heitor, you are using a 3ware 95xx or 96xx with BBU write cache > and write caching on right? How much RAM do you have for your cache? How > is your raid10 configured? I cannot believe a four disk raid0 array can > beat a software raid mirror of scsi disks as used by Bruce Guenter. that last sentence should have been 'cannot beat'