Christopher Chan wrote: > > ext3 again takes the slowest performing title overall as expected...in > fact it appears not much as changed fs vs fs wise since Bruce > Guenter's tests. I agree but the values are more "acceptable" in comparision with others filesystems. On Bruce tests it shows a very bad performance for reading. > But I am surprised at the overall performance regressions in > comparison to 2.6.5/6 kernels with regards to deliveries vs amount of > writers.Heitor, you are using a 3ware 95xx or 96xx with BBU write > cache and write caching on right? How much RAM do you have for your > cache? How is your raid10 configured? I cannot believe a four disk > raid0 array can beat a software raid mirror of scsi disks as used by > Bruce Guenter. > 3ware 9650SE with BBU and write cache on. Available memory: 224 MB Bus Type/Speed: PCIe/2.5 Gbps RAID10: 4 RAID1 subunits with MAXTOR STM3500630AS 500GB SATA2 > > Thanks Heitor. Is the site down or something? I cannot access the > page....it is timing out. The site is online now. Regards, Heitor A. M. Cardozo