[CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?

Sun Dec 9 19:32:57 UTC 2007
Heiko Adams <heiko.adams at gmail.com>

Am Sonntag, den 09.12.2007, 21:27 +0200 schrieb Axel Thimm:
> ...
> I'll just repeat myself: If the packagers don't cooperate no technical
> solution will be able to really cover compatibilty problems. You'll
> paper over some of them and create a false feeling that you have
> mastered the compatibility problem and still wonder later why it
> doesn't work. I've seen dozen of such false bug reports which I call
> "partial/selective enabling of repos". Google the last term and you
> find many bad examples of such "solutions".
IMHO the best solution would be if CentOS would ship its repo-files
preconfigured for yum-priorities plugin and the priorities plugin for
yum by default. This would prevent that 3rd party repos to override
CentOS base packages.
-- 
Heiko Adams <heiko.adams at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071209/db640832/attachment-0005.sig>