On Dec 11, 2007 2:17 PM, Matt Hyclak <hyclak at math.ohiou.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:13:10PM -0800, MHR enlightened us: > > > Please note: the version number listed in the rpm -qa is 2.3.0, but the > > version number listed in the yum update confirmation is 2.0.4. > > > > rpm -qa --queryformat "%{epoch}:%{name}-%{release}-%{version}.%{arch}" openoffice* > > I bet they have an epoch of 0, but the 2.0.4 packages have an epoch of 1, > which means they are newer, even though the version number is smaller. > They work like the 2.0 version from before, meaning the same bug I moved to 2.3 to avoid. So, I guess I'll put in an exclude until something else changes. Thanks. mhr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071211/714dd9e4/attachment-0005.html>