Mark Pryor wrote: >> Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/bin/false is needed >> by package perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 >> > Sure the SPEC is broken since the dependency is on a > binary file from package coreutils, rather than > another RPM. just curious: isn't it OK for a SPEC to have a dep on a file rather than a package? Although in this case the path is wrong, it's /bin/false on centos, so the depsolver must fail.