Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:27:44 +0100: > That is a (common) misinterpretation coming from our native language. > What you mean would be the "last version of the 5 series". The latest > means current (as in "the latest and greatest version of them all"). Oh, well. I *do* know the difference, but it seems in this context I got it wrong. I'm not so sure, though, if "current" would have made a difference. I still think the use of "latest" and "point" (or "current") release is ambiguous, as these "values" shift over time. Wouldn't this be better (also note the second example at the end): Starting from CentOS 5.1 the Upstream OS Provider will be providing updates for each minor version release (5.1.1,5.1.2 ...) for a period of time next to the corresponding major version release (5.1). Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com