on 12/14/2007 10:53 AM Craig White spake the following: > On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:40 -0800, Scott Silva wrote: >> on 12/13/2007 6:43 PM Chris Mauritz spake the following: >>> Scott Silva wrote: >>>>>>> evolution <<<<-------- >>>>> Actually, if you're using Windows XP (32-bit), Evolution does work. >>>>> At least according to these folks: >>>>> >>>>> http://shellter.sourceforge.net/evolution/ >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>> After trying this, it doesn't work very well. >>>> >>>> "These aren't the droids we're looking for. You can go about your >>>> business. Move along. Move along." >>> >>> I haven't actually tried it myself since I'm satisfied with >>> Thunderbird. What exactly was wrong with it? I've never used Evolution >>> (even on Linux) since it always seemed rather buggy to me. >>> >> I tried a quick install "just to see" and no matter how I tried to connect to >> my imap server, it kept throwing ssl errors, even without trying an encrypted >> connection. In no way could I connect and display messages or folders. >> Then after uninstall, it left a lot of stuff behind, still running. >> I think the creator made it just fit their requirements and stopped. > ---- > I've been using Evolution in various versions via CentOS, RHEL and > Fedora for years, always with an IMAP server and using TLS too. Note > that this e-mail (like all my e-mails whether from office or home) was > written with Evolution. > > Never had an issue > > The only feature that it seems to lack is support for namespaces such as > those offered by cyrus with shared folders. > > Craig I assure you, my negative was for the windows port mentioned above. I just don't think it is quite ready for prime time yet. The native linux port I don't have a problem with. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!