[CentOS] Defending againts simultanious attacks
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Feb 15 21:38:01 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Defending againts simultanious attacks
- Next message: [CentOS] Defending againts simultanious attacks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Drew Weaver wrote: > I find it kind of odd that noone has come up with a 'RBL' for bots... > > ISPs could easily receive routes via BGP from "some trusted source" that > has NULL routes for all of the 'infected' hosts which are attacking > people.. > > A few dozen honeypots and you would quickly have a large list of > infected hosts in which to ignore entirely. Vint Cerf recently estimated that one-fourth of the computers in the world had such an infection... Are you prepared to handled a list bigger than internet BGP routers already deal with? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Defending againts simultanious attacks
- Next message: [CentOS] Defending againts simultanious attacks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list