-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:23:52PM -0600, Barry Brimer wrote: > >Anyone else using CFS on CentOS 4.4 ? > >I have started using it today (unimportant stuff for now, for testing), > >and am wondering what are other people experiences with it. > > > >I'm using version 1.4.1, rpms kindly provided by Karan on his repository. > > > >My main concern is data loss, not security itself. From what I noticed, > >the strenght of CFS crypto is less than optimal. > > > >CFS right now looks like a very convenient solution. Much easier than the > >losetup stuff (which is a PITA). > > I have not tried TrueCrypt yet, only read about it. Maybe it would be > useful as well. > <http://www.truecrypt.org> PITA. Needs the kernel source to compile. Which might (probably) indicate you will need to recompile it whenever you upgrade your kernel. Anyway, read about it, and it sounds interesting. But a little bit too much for my current needs. Tkx for the pointer. I might check it again in the future. []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFws5QpdyWzQ5b5ckRAuJ5AJ0WdbiyM2p+oRh+cH+jKqLrg5nYRQCgk2J3 Lhdu9nEow8a3V4TQ7LOXKKE= =0wDn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----