On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 03:44 -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > > Truecypt again, uses a file as a storage block. > > Which is a big problem. Easy to get everything corrupted. Which is why I don't like it.. > > I have 2 problems while using cfs so far. Both were due to a small > problem on the ext2 filesystem where it was stored. I was copying > a file to the cfs filesystem (both on the same ext2 fs). > Is CFS a file-by-file encryption or file-based block encryption?? (I forget) > I've got a complete lockdown on cfsd, and had to hardboot the > machine. In both cases, I've lost nothing, and only the specific > file I was copying, on the destination, was "lost" (partially copied). > It gave me a VERY good impression of cfs' robustness. That sounds Good. heh..