>> It seems I lacked clarity: my point is that the rules are too >> stringent and restrict perfectly innocent browsing. Almost any >> longish document will contain enough bad words to be blocked, >> especially if it contains current teen-speak. It's a well-know problem about the using of regular expressions as a basis of blocked sites. I can read the next from SquidGuard documentation: --- Unless you build your expressions very very carefully there is a high risk you will have annoyed users on your neck. Typically you might accidentally block "Essex", "Sussex", "breastcancer", "www.x.org" etc. in your eagerness for blocking pornographic material. In practice you would probably replace some of the words in the example above with some more clearly pornographic related words that I don't find appropriate to list here. ---- So if you use regexp you should be aware of that. :-/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070212/3a46bf68/attachment-0005.sig>