On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:15:09AM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: > >Well ... the majority of our problems are coming from the fact that > >upstream did not build everything on the same builder. They > >grabbed .fc6 stuff as is and used it (not necessarily compiled on their > >el5 builder). > >Many items are compiled against different kernel-headers, etc. > Wow! Why did they do that? Anybody knows? Red Hat seems to have, for a long time, followed a policy of not rebuilding packages which have been through QA unless there is a reason to rebuild them. So, packages which were built against older headers stay that way until there's either a new package release or a problem. -- Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>