[CentOS] Risks of installing i386 rpms on a x86_64 CentOS 4.4 installation
Maciej Ĺťenczykowski
maze at cela.plMon Jan 22 03:35:00 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Risks of installing i386 rpms on a x86_64 CentOS 4.4 installation
- Next message: [CentOS] i386 or x86_64 installation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> > Are there any risks in installing i386 binaries (via rpm) on a x86_64 >> > installation of CentOS 4.4? Personally I find that the best solution is to install an i386, then swapout the kernel, install a few extra 64 bit libraries, and then potentially reinstall whatever packages you need to be 64bit for performance reasons. [Mind you, you might need to mess around a bit to get this working, I can't remember the exact steps I took last time I did this to get the rpms to install without complaints, but I think I remember actually doing both a i386 and x86_64 install in seperate partitions and then doing a manual merge and removing one of them... should probably document it...] Me? I use 32-bit everything, except kernel, libc, stdlibc++ and the compiler. But then all I need it for is development of short but extremely memory hogging C/C++ applications. Maciej
- Previous message: [CentOS] Risks of installing i386 rpms on a x86_64 CentOS 4.4 installation
- Next message: [CentOS] i386 or x86_64 installation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list