On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 12:36 -0500, Drew Weaver wrote: > Well, on the other hand 2.6.18 was released over 4 months ago (1 quarter > of a year). > > So I guess you can look at it either way. > This might be a shocker ... if you don't want a distro that is compatible with RHEL ... then CentOS is not for you. There are any number of distros out there that use the 2.6.18 kernel (centos-5 will have that too). I am sorry if people want the newest kernel ... or the newest KDE ... or the newest [pick your package]. CentOS has stated goals ... and providing an enterprise distro that is as close as legally possible to the upsteam sources is what we do. If that is not what one wants ... then by all means, use something else. CentOS is not Ubuntu, it's not Gentoo ... it is what it is. That is all ... carry on -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070119/bd8b3647/attachment-0005.sig>