should I try to report this scim bug?(was Re: [CentOS] scim-panel-gtk segfault (2))
Shawn
javajunkie at koyuru.com
Fri Jul 20 09:12:43 UTC 2007
Hi,
> Here's more info on the problem below:
>
> newer scim packages scim-1.4.6-5.fc8 (fc8) do fix a segfault:
I upgraded to the fc8 scim packages and found the segfault on shut down
went away. So it seems known. Still, should I try to report this bug
so we can get a proper package for centos5 from upstream?
Shawn
> * Fri Nov 17 2006 Shawn Huang <phuang at redhat.com> - 1.4.5-2
> - add scim-fix-unload-segfault.patch to fix xim process segfaulting
> when already running (#206995)
>
> Could that be the issue?
>
> ------previous post below --------
>
> Running kernel 2.6.18-8.1.4.el5.centos.plus on centos5, on shutdown
> sometimes I get:
>
> Starting killall:
> Sending all processes the TERM signal...scim-panel-gtk
> ...scim-panel-gtk[4065]- segfault at... error 4.
> (sometimes there is one segfault error and sometimes 7+]
>
> rpm -qa | grep scim
> scim-1.4.4-39.el5.x86_64
> scim-bridge-gtk-0.4.5-7.el5.i386
> scim-libs-1.4.4-39.el5.x86_64
> scim-bridge-0.4.5-7.el5.x86_64
> scim-anthy-1.2.0-5.el5.x86_64
> scim-bridge-gtk-0.4.5-7.el5.x86_64
More information about the CentOS
mailing list