[CentOS] postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.base.i386.rpm vs postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.plus.i386.rpm

Johnny Hughes johnny at centos.org
Tue Jul 24 12:17:41 UTC 2007

Matt Hyclak wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:11:59PM +0200, David Hrbá? enlightened us:
>> what are the differences between
>> postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.base.i386.rpm vs
>> postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.plus.i386.rpm. Changelogs are
>> the very same and there's no announcement.
> This was just discussed on the mailing list - the .base. package is built
> against Postgres and MySQL from the official CentOS release, the .plus. is
> built against the upgraded Postgres and MySQL in the CentOSPlus repository. 
> Johnny sent an explanation (might have been to the -devel list, not sure) of
> how best to configure yum for each situation.

Here is link to that mail for this tread (for future searches):


Johnny Hughes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070724/a35c6041/attachment.sig>

More information about the CentOS mailing list