[CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

Feizhou feizhou at graffiti.net
Thu Jul 26 09:57:00 UTC 2007

beast wrote:
> On 26/07/07 11:21 +0700, beast wrote:
>>> CentOS 5.0 as the base, but OpenOffice repo, Firefox repo and
>>> possibly Gnome or KDE repo to keep primary office applications
>>> current.
>> I'm confused here. Suppose in the next 3 year the latest OO version is 
>> 3.1.1,
>> today OO in Centos5 is 2.0.4, will it get updated to version 3.x or still
>> using 2.x? 
> It seems not. Updates directory in Centos 3 still contains OOv1.1.2 only.
> So, what is the meaning of "supported for 5 years"? is it only for bug and
> security fixes, not features or enhancements?

Sometimes you get enhancements and features.

> Suppose in the next year, standard interface for harddisk is WATA 
> (wireless ATA
> :), will it be added in Centos5?

The RHEL4 kernel did get a libata update.

> Sorry for asking such questions, i just reaaly want to know here :)
>> or better just upgrade to Centos7 which has OOv3.1?
> If I choose this path, can it be automatically done using yum with local
> repository? what about existing data/settings/custom apps/etc? anyone has
> real experiences on upgrading OS?

You really want apt and deb based distros like ubuntu if you want to go 
this route.

> Personally, I never upgrade the OS. I simply install the fresh one, but its
> fine on my laptop, not for my clients.

Use images then if all your 400 workstations are identical.

More information about the CentOS mailing list