[CentOS] Re: Hard disk recomendation for a software raid 5 array. Does Linux Software Raid support/interacts well with TLER enabled disks.
ssilva at sgvwater.com
Fri Jul 27 17:19:59 UTC 2007
Alexander Georgiev spake the following on 7/27/2007 5:32 AM:
> Hi people,
> I am building a cheap remote rsync backup server using a software raid
> 5 array of 4 500GB disks. What I have available on the market is:
> 1. HITACHI GST Deskstar T7K500 500GB 7200rpm 16MB cache Serial ATA II-300
> 2. SEAGATE Barracuda 7200.10 with NCQ 500GB 7200rpm 16MB cache Serial ATA II-300
> 3. Western Digital 500GB SATAII RAID EDITION Caviar SE16 7200rpm 8.9ms
> 16MB cache
> I am tempted to use the Western Digital Raid Edition as it has 5
> years of warranty. However I found out that the "Raid Edition" means
> that the disk supports TLER - time limited error recovery:
> A more profound description can be found here
> In summary, the error recovery time of the hard disk is reduced to 8
> second. If the hard disk cannot perform the recovery it will report an
> error to the RAID controller and delegate the recovery to the
> As I intend to use linux software raid on Centos 5, I will not have a
> RAID controller to deal with this delegated error, but two cheap I/O
> SATA controllers.
> Has anybody used 'raid edition' disks with software raid?
> Does anybody know how linux software raid interacts/supports these TLER disks.
> Best regards
I have used raid aware and non-raid aware disks for both hardware and software
raid. You really want the raid edition drives, as they will send a fail up the
channel much faster than a non-raid drive. The non-raid drives will retry over
and over, and you stand a chance of data loss while they decide what to do.
Software raid will just fail the drive and switch to degraded mode.
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
More information about the CentOS