[CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
Ray Van Dolson
rvandolson at esri.com
Mon Jul 30 19:15:31 UTC 2007
> Looking at your requests on this you should realize that repotags are
> what you are really asking for the minimum level, which is what epel
> nuked to ashes. So the discussion should probably move away from this
> list to the epel list. And since it's a dead topic there as well you
> will not really get very far.
I know EPEL acknowledged that the whole repo-conflicts thing is an
issue that needed to be addressed... as has been rehashed many times,
they just didn't like repotags.
However, perhaps adding something into RPM itself could go a long way
to addressing this in a more integrated manner?
That thread might be a good place to request that something like this
Not sure how high of a priority everyone would consider it.
More information about the CentOS