[CentOS] Both archs version rpm are installed during update?
Mark Hull-Richter
mhullrich at gmail.comTue Jul 3 01:46:23 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Both archs version rpm are installed during update?
- Next message: [CentOS] Both archs version rpm are installed during update? - related firefox plugin issues.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 7/2/07, Richard Chapman <rchapman at aardvark.com.au> wrote: > I was interested to see that Firefox java and flash plugins aren't > available in x86_64. > Does this explain why flash and/or java plugins aren't working on my > Centos 5 x86_64 installation. If I go to (say) you-tube - it tells me I > don't have the latest flash player - or don't have java enabled. If I > follow their instructions on installing them - it tells me they are > already installed. > > Anyone else found this - and found a solution? > Yes - use the i386 version of Firefox and the plugins will work. I use the i386 version of SeaMonkey as I had the same problems with the x86_64 bit version, and they work fine. mhr
- Previous message: [CentOS] Both archs version rpm are installed during update?
- Next message: [CentOS] Both archs version rpm are installed during update? - related firefox plugin issues.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list