[CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.eduSun Jul 29 20:31:53 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
drew einhorn wrote: > Dumb question. > > Can't we identify the source of the package by looking at the signature. Signature, vendor, etc... right. Pretty much why epel (so far) didn't see the need/value in the complexity/overhead of introducing repotags. That said, my personal opinion is/was that epel *should* use them, if for no other reason so that others can't use it to support arguments of non-cooperation (too late). -- Rex
- Previous message: [CentOS] Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list