[CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comMon Jul 30 20:57:23 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Axel Thimm wrote: >> I don't think this issue has any solution other than separate >> namespaces. > > Looking at your requests on this you should realize that repotags are > what you are really asking for the minimum level, which is what epel > nuked to ashes. So the discussion should probably move away from this > list to the epel list. And since it's a dead topic there as well you > will not really get very far. I don't know enough about repotags to understand why everyone needs them. Can't any repotag be distinguished from no repotag? Why is there any need for cooperation beyond not choosing the same tag or lack thereof? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list