[CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comTue Jul 31 20:43:46 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dag Wieers wrote: > > My believe is that repotags was not the issue. There was something else > that made it impossible. And I can not undo the thought that it is because > not having repotags makes EPEL authoritative and masks dependency > problems. Can you explain that? Authoritative over who/what? > It has an unfair advantage for the repository that does not tag its > packages, and it is certainly not advantageous to the userbase. Advantage at what? And if there is only one untagged repo, can't the userbase tell who to blame? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list