On Friday 06 July 2007, Garrick Staples wrote: > Why LD_LIBRARY_PATH is bad: > http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/_/ldpath.html Not argueing against you here, but "...is prepended to the existing list of compiled-in loader paths for a given executable, and any system default..." from the link above isn't quite true on linux. rpath'ed stuff in the binary is searched before even LD_LIBRARY_PATH. /Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070706/27ded86d/attachment-0004.sig>