[CentOS] Wireless newtworking in CentOS 5

Mon Jul 16 19:39:56 UTC 2007
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at darkover.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 02:03:42PM -0500, B.J. McClure wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 15:48 -0300, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 08:16:13PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > > Ummmm. The drivers are free, they are licensed under the GPL v2. The
> > > firmware is the problem:
> > > <http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net/firmware.php?fid=7> - I don't think we
> > > want to distribute that (we seem to be allowed to do so under certain
> > > conditions, but my legalese sucks, especially the english dialect of
> > > it). Yes, that sucks. And I'm sure their excuse is "FCC regulations".
> > 
> > Just read it. We definitivelly don't want to distribute it.
> > 
> > - -- 
> > Rodrigo Barbosa
> > "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
> > "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
> > 
> I just read the entire document as well as Exhibit A.  I do not find any
> prohibition against distribution, only conditions which should be met if
> it is distributed to end users.  Would you be kind enough to point out
> the section or paragraph which you interpret to prohibit distribution.
> Thanks in advance.

I'm sorry. Would you point to be where I said it prohibits distribution ?

I said we don't WANT do distribute it.

[]s

- -- 
Rodrigo Barbosa
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGm8mMpdyWzQ5b5ckRAkgHAJ9AkNpl0Z4anBuMhVVjDy6QpuAsgwCgpug9
LoEFISdsGuCVp5tiY3uis/8=
=lqUw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----