Great idea, But to take it one step further, think I'll use 10, 20, 30, ... That way I'll have room to insert new levels where ever I need them. On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7/26/07, drew einhorn <drew.einhorn at gmail.com> wrote: > > Here's how I set up my repository priorities, with some questions, > > and request for comments on whether there are better ways of doing > > things. I'm running on CentOS 5, some of the repositories do not > > exist, some exist but are empty, etc. > > If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the > highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base > etc. > > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Drew Einhorn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070726/fbc29229/attachment-0004.html>