Matt Hyclak wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:11:59PM +0200, David Hrbá? enlightened us: >> what are the differences between >> postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.base.i386.rpm vs >> postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.plus.i386.rpm. Changelogs are >> the very same and there's no announcement. > > This was just discussed on the mailing list - the .base. package is built > against Postgres and MySQL from the official CentOS release, the .plus. is > built against the upgraded Postgres and MySQL in the CentOSPlus repository. > > Johnny sent an explanation (might have been to the -devel list, not sure) of > how best to configure yum for each situation. Here is link to that mail for this tread (for future searches): http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-July/084087.html Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070724/a35c6041/attachment-0005.sig>