On 7/26/07, Dave K <davek08054 at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > > If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the > > highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base > > etc. > > I'm just starting to "play with" priorities, but I actually made mine > all multiples of 10 on the first setup to make tuning easier. Great minds think alike. I just sent a message suggesting the same thing. Also, I think I've found that if you really want to use the "plus" > repo it needs to be the same priority as "base" and "updates". That could be a problem. Thanks. -- > Dave K > Unix Systems & Network Administrator > Mount Laurel NJ > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Drew Einhorn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070726/d273941a/attachment-0005.html>