Johnny Hughes wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >> It's quite a stetch from "no repotags" to >> conclude "EPEL has no interest" in compatibility. >> In fact, epel (and fedora) repo is, by design and policy, supposed to be >> compatible and considerate of other repos, e.g. most notably, >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/RepositoryCollaboration >> (among other project policy documents). >> When I posted the aforementioned repository collaboration document to the >> rpmforge list(s) for comment, it received none. > There is talk about cooperation and collaboration, however whenever Axel > or Dag made any kind of suggestions on the EPEL list, they were not > given very much "real" consideration. Only wrt to repotags. Don't remember any serious/significant discussions outside of that since. Am I missing something? So, is rpmforge interested in collaboration or not? Does the RepositoryCollaboration sound like a reasonable starting place? -- Rex