fixing thread hijack in subject line On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Les Mikesell wrote: > Red Hat fixed their bug: > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0365.html I haven't > seen a response to centos bugzilla 0002160 that I filed a > month ago about this. Did you look at a system before posting? Or just shoot from the hip? [herrold at centos-4 ~]$ lynx -dump http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0365.html | grep -i srpm SRPMS: SRPMS: [herrold at centos-4 ~]$ no linked SRPMS > And they have a packaged Sun Java available > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2007-0223.html > (that's the link for rhel4 but I think there is one for 5 too). [herrold at centos-4 ~]$ lynx -dump http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2007-0223.html | grep -i srpm SRPMS: [herrold at centos-4 ~]$ no linked SRPMS ... cannot prove the fix exists to me so far. Sad that Red Hat feels it has to play these games. but I see in my mirroring: /mnt/nfs/var/ftp/pub/mirror/redhat/rhel/rhel-5/5Server/all/SRPMS/redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-17.el5.src.rpm dunno when it showed up and it is not worth checking my detail logs, because: Johnny notes it has been updated and is in updates which have been issued over a week ago -- it is a convenience fix, and not a security matter > has been updated and is in updates: > > version: redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-17.0.1.el5.centos.noarch.rpm > > released 7/22/2007 and _looking_, yum shows it updated on myC5 system Les ... you have an open bug -- you think it is fixed upstream. No SRPMS are noted in teh fix release which you seemingly were able to find. The tests I did, you can do. Why not lend a hand and point to available source RPMs rather than carp on the mailing list on stale matters? If you dislike non-security related updates notifications, write a tool to provide you information on the changes. -- Russ Herrold