[CentOS] yum remove 'tomcat*'?

Tue Jul 31 16:44:31 UTC 2007
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

Les Mikesell wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> Not from Red Hat (wrt sun java) ... they did use tomcat and gcj.  If
>>>> you
>>>> want sun java, I imagine you would have to change the specs and
>>>> rebuild.
>>>>   I have no idea how to do that (I have not looked at it at all).
>>> Red Hat fixed their bug:
>>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0365.html
>>
>> That has been pushed to updates ... however, I don't see it has any
>> impact on open office.  It is related to tomcat.
> 
> I was trying to remove the non-working tomcat with the idea of replacing
> it with something else and openoffice went with it.  Odd, but fixable.
> 
>>> I haven't seen a response to centos bugzilla 0002160 that I filed a
>>> month ago about this.
>>
>> I didn't see the bug before ... but it was released 7/22/2007:
>> redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-17.0.1.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
> 
> Thanks, but I thought the bug was related to the way the way the
> java-containing rpms were built (or maybe installed..) and this rpm just
> fixes the process.  What will it take to get working indexes into the
> jar files for tomcat (and probably other apps) on an existing system?
> 

The new tomcat was built with the new redhat-rpm-config, so all the
System OS files should be good.  AFAIK the bug you pointed to was to
correct the md5sums issues for mutltiarch builds.

From the bug:
brp-java-repack-jars is a post processing script included in
redhat-rpm-config that removes timestamp differences in jars to ensure
multi-lib packages do not conflict.

> Also, is there any chance of duplicating those Red Hat sun jdk rpms? I
> think you've said no before, but I'm curious about how debian was able
> to manage it: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/sun-java5 if it
> is still problematic to redistribute.
> 

They are not distributable by Centos ... and they are IBM Java, not Sun
Java.

Debain agreed to indemnify Sun ... we won't.

Thanks,
Johnny hUghes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070731/abeb87d5/attachment-0005.sig>