[CentOS] Re: Dovecot .99 Bug - LF not found where expected

Bazooka Joe fastfish at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 17:51:57 UTC 2007

no mbox conversion is needed.   as mentioned before the only down side
is that your pop users that keep mail on the server will redownload
their mail as duplicates.

If anyone needs the rpm for fc4 let me know. I don't think it is on
the net anymore.

On 6/8/07, Bart Schaefer <barton.schaefer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/8/07, Andy Wright <centos at eltofts.homelinux.com> wrote:
> >
> > atrpms.net/el4-i386/atrpms/stable/dovecot-1.0.0-8_56.el4.at.i386.rpm
> Andy/Chris -- any particular issues with upgrading from 0.99 to 1.0?
> We have a server that's been in production for about a year with 0.99
> and strores many hundreds of unix-flat-file (often so-called "mbox"
> format) mailboxes as well as MH-style one-message-per-numbered file
> mailboxes.  Our Outlook users occasionally have access trouble and I'd
> like to try 1.0, but not if it means breaking access to any of these
> mailboxes or having to go through a lengthy conversion process (we
> have a logrotate-style archival scheme that is tied to the present
> file layouts so conversion is non-trivial even if there is some kind
> of automated way to change formats).
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

More information about the CentOS mailing list