[CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?
Steve Searle
steve at stevesearle.comTue Jun 12 08:30:28 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?
- Next message: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Around 09:21am on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 (UK time), Feizhou scrawled: > Well, desktop related problems aside, Fedora can be very useful in a > server environment. Weird that others find Fedora great on the desktop > but would never touch it with a ten foot pole for a server :P. Although I find Fedora stable enough to use as a server, the frequency of having to upgrade to a new version means I find Centos a better choice. As others have said, upgrading every 4 years or so is much better than upgrading every year. I use Fedora on all my workstations, however. Steve -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting a bad thing? 09:27:34 up 14:06, 0 users, load average: 0.02, 0.01, 0.00 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070612/9f6b9546/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?
- Next message: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list