Tony Molloy wrote: > On Friday 08 June 2007 12:07, Chris Mauritz wrote: > >> Tony Molloy wrote: >> >>> On Thursday 07 June 2007 17:59, Chris Mauritz wrote: >>> >>>> Scott Silva wrote: >>>> >>>>> A RedHat bug report is your only option if you stay with 0.99. >>>>> I bit the bullet and upgraded to 1.0.0 with an rpm from rpmforge. >>>>> The performance is much better. Almost as much improvement as when I >>>>> first switched from wuimap. >>>>> >>>> I agree with Scott. I also bit the bullet and went to 1.0 (also from >>>> rpmforge) and am testing it now. It is noticeably faster and I look >>>> forward to not dealing with that bug again (though it doesn't happen >>>> very often). >>>> >>> Could you please give the URL for the download. I'm looking at rpmforge >>> site and all I can see is 0.99-14 >>> >>> I know it's a friday but... >>> >> I am pretty sure I used this: >> >> http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/dovecot/ >> >> Sorry, it wasn't rpmforge after all. >> >> Best, >> >> > > Happens to the best of us at times. I just thought I was going blind ;-) > > Thanks, > > Tony > Boy, this is starting to sound like it might be a really good package to add to CentOS plus or extras? (hint hint) And maybe a Wiki on doing the swap? I'll try to make some notes when I have time to get around to upgrading dovecot on one of our servers, although I'm no wizard like so many working to provide CentOS. I found that my bug report was a duplicate... I searched but nothing showed up.. but there was a report in April to RedHat. Still, from what I hear about the config, I would be surprised if they did anything more than a backport, since it sounds like dovecot 1+ has a lot of nice improvements. Best, John Hinton