Steve Searle wrote: > Around 09:21am on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 (UK time), Feizhou scrawled: > >> Well, desktop related problems aside, Fedora can be very useful in a >> server environment. Weird that others find Fedora great on the desktop >> but would never touch it with a ten foot pole for a server :P. > > Although I find Fedora stable enough to use as a server, the frequency > of having to upgrade to a new version means I find Centos a better > choice. As others have said, upgrading every 4 years or so is much > better than upgrading every year. It is certainly less of a headache. No need to build a system just to handle deployment (not that this is a bad thing...) once a year along with whatever you need if you do not have that many servers and therefore such a system would be overkill.