Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote: >> Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing >> improved here and wait for 3.0? >> > > Sorry to jump in, but where is that you saw Red Hat saying "there is > nothing _improved_ in FF2"?! When I was googling for any rpms, I found a number of threads on the subject. It COULD have been a bit of sour grapes on RH's part that really they were too busy with EL5 to deal with someone else's project (Firefox 2)... > I suppose RHEL5 doesn't have FF2 because > "it's too new", but here is what I terribly miss while using FF1.5: > -- saving the whole session, even when FF crashes (yes, FF _may_ > crash); it saves even the text you were writing in a textarea! > -- spell-checking (extremely useful when you're not a native speaker). > I have found this to be a frustrating 'option' Even when I shutdown FF2 cleanly, when I start it (even after rebooting the system), it trys to resume my sessions... > But indeed is kinda shame that there isn't any 3rd party repo > providing FF2 for EL5. (I don't expect EPEL to have it. because FC6 > was on FF1.5 too). > Yeah, you would think it would be on ATrpms by now. > But for Thunderbird 2.0, I agree: I can't see anything _significantly_ > improved. > ok.