Le Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:07:55 +0200 Martin Hamant <mh at accelance.fr> écrivait: > Le Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:14:08 -0500 (CDT) > "Brent DiNicola" <centos at elric.net> écrivait: > > > For those curious, since the devs haven't given an answer yet to the > > future of the Postfix with MySQL in CentOS Plus, here is the patch > > to add the MySQL support back into Postfix that I used in case > > anyone needs it. I might have messed up the naming but I tried to > > pick something relevant that wouldn't be later confused with what > > they would do too much. > > > > About that, is the following is wanted ? > > (centosplus activated) > > # yum --disablerepo=base list postfix > Setting up repositories > Reading repository metadata in from local files > Available Packages > postfix.i386 2:2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2.mys > centosplus # yum list postfix > Setting up repositories > Reading repository metadata in from local files > Available Packages > postfix.i386 2:2.2.10-1.1.el4 base > > > So with that settings, if you don't pass "--disablerepo=base", your > postfix instance will be replaced with the one in "base" repo with no > mysql support :/ > > What's the "official" way to install postfix with mysql support and be > sure that next time it will be updated with a new version of postfix > with mysql support ? > > Ty ;) > On another system: # yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=centosplus list all | grep postfix postfix.i386 2:2.1.5-4.2.RHEL4.MYSQ installed postfix-pflogsumm.i386 2:2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2.mys centosplus Result expected (on a working tested system): # yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=centosplus list all | grep postfix postfix.i386 2:2.1.5-4.2.RHEL4.mysq installed postfix.i386 2:2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2.mys centosplus postfix-pflogsumm.i386 2:2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2.mys centosplus Where is the "new" postfix 2.2.10 ? I cleaned up cache with "yum clean all" but no way. If I grep "postfix" in primary.xml, I can find it... I just can't understand why it's not list on yum output. md5sum of primary.xml.gz is exactly the same on each system, that's the same metadata. Help would be appreciated :/ -- Martin