[CentOS] Tape drive recommendations
John Plemons
john at mavin.comTue Mar 27 15:39:11 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Tape drive recommendations
- Next message: [CentOS] Tape drive recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Backup also would need to include an off site push. One thing I've learned is never depend on one method, I have the main nightly backup to disk and then also have a secondary and tertiary backup pushing off site to machines in a different part of the country. I had such a crash 6 months ago, and had my company up and running within 3 hours remotely using a secondary server. They were in California, the server was in Tennessee, it took several days to repair and rebuild the primary server, but down time was kept to a minimum and when we went live on the primary just a simple restore from the secondary server. So nasty it wasn't, having gone through the same thing with tape it was a lot worse, we would be down for days instead of a few hours. john plemons John R Pierce wrote: > John Plemons wrote: >> Skip the tape route, install a network backup machine using a raid >> setup instead. It is quicker and cleaner.Also it can be done in >> either Windows, or Centos without any big tricks.. > > That works great for 'nearline' short term backups, but it doesn't > play real well with many emergency recovery plan requirements, such as > offsite backups, long term archive retention, etc. One nasty crash > on that archive filesystem and a few dozen terabytes of backups could > become junk. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >
- Previous message: [CentOS] Tape drive recommendations
- Next message: [CentOS] Tape drive recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list