[CentOS] Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comFri Mar 30 21:06:42 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?
- Next message: [CentOS] Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Morten Torstensen wrote: > > I would think that Oracle would run pretty much out of the box on > RHEL5 (and CentOS 5), as the kernel/glibc is not bleeding edge and > Redhat works pretty close with Oracle (as they do with other > Enterprise software). That does not mean it is ready for production, > but it should be ready for testing and piloting. > indeed, I've heard Oracle flat out won't support you if you're running on CentOS 4, even tho its functionally nearly identical to RHEL4 which is supported.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?
- Next message: [CentOS] Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list