[CentOS] Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?
Morten Torstensen
morten at mortent.orgFri Mar 30 21:54:15 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?
- Next message: [CentOS] Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
cameron wrote: > If you can afford an Oracle license, why not just buy a RHEL license? It is a valid point :) > RHEL. RHEL has at least three different versions; Desktop, Advanced and > Server. I couldn't find anything on the centos.org page about which of > the variants the source is rebuilt from. maybe a collect of all? CentOS4 is REHL4 AS. RHEL5 is a little different, with the packaging of the cluster stuff seperately. -- //Morten Torstensen //Email: morten at mortent.org //IM: Cartoon at jabber.no morten.torstensen at gmail.com And if it turns out that there is a God, I don't believe that he is evil. The worst that can be said is that he's an underachiever.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?
- Next message: [CentOS] Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list