On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 02:28:37PM +0900, John Summerfield wrote: > >One downside of the current scheme is that there's no error checking for > >invalid values. If you've put something that isn't valid, it just fails > >without explaining. > This is the error checking in Nahant. Those are line numbers. > > 31 # Fallbacks, in order > 32 exec gdm $* >/dev/null 2>&1 > 33 exec kdm $* >/dev/null 2>&1 > 34 exec xdm $* >/dev/null 2>&1 > 35 > If none of those takes, you aren't going to get a GUI login. Right, that's not checking for invalid values. It's just providing a fallback and crossing fingers. -- Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>