John R Pierce wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote:
>
>> Isn't cached swap somewhat an oxymoron? Why cache virtual?
>> Am I misunderstanding this line from top?
>>
>> Swap: 524120k total, 80760k used, 443360k free, 73448k cached
>>
>> Mike
>
>
>
> its not cached swap, they just put the cached on the end of the swap
> line because it fits.
Then it should read:
Swap: 524120k total, 80760k used, 443360k free; Cached: 73448k
> I'll say this, its not often I see swap used > cached. that machine
> definately could use more memory.
I have 256MB total, yes. Want to donate to the fund? Guaranteed
not tax deductible.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!