Scott Silva wrote: > John Summerfield spake the following on 3/27/2007 5:28 PM: >> >>Which would annoy you more? >>1. Update sans announcement >>2. Announcement sans update. >> >>There will always be a timing issue, and I'd go with releasing the >>update, allowing mirrors to sync and then the announcement. >> >> >> >> > > As long as the sysop doesn't depend on announcements to do updates, it > shouldn't matter. > You can always cron yum check-update, and read the cron mail. As far as I can tell, RH does not announce all updates to RHEL4. btw I just discovered my FC6 test system busily trying to update itself, without my consent. My consent would certainly be withheld, there's no way I can track FC updates through a modem, especially with all the stuff I do want. FC6 may well find itself replaced with Debian. -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Please do not reply off-list