> Joe Pruett wrote: >> > Is it this one in the upstream? >> > >> > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2007-0128.html >> >> yes, that is the one. i was wondering if the announcement just was >> forgotten or if the updates wasn't really ready yet but slipped into the >> repos. > > Which would annoy you more? > 1. Update sans announcement > 2. Announcement sans update. > > There will always be a timing issue, and I'd go with releasing the update, > allowing mirrors to sync and then the announcement. i was actually more concerned about a rogue package getting slipped in somehow.