[CentOS] Re: Anaconda doesn't support raid10
Ruslan Sivak
rsivak at istandfor.com
Thu May 10 05:42:40 UTC 2007
Feizhou wrote:
> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
>> Hey look at me! I'm top-posting!!! Nanny-nanny-poo-poo
>>
>> Come get me Trolls!
>
> Please do not top post. :)
>
He was probably hinting at me for top posting. Unfortunately, sometimes
I write from the blackberry, which only allows top posting. Take it up
with RIM.
>
>> SATA drives typically do 60-70MBs, interleaved you
>> should see 120-140MB/s on sequential. Random IO on SATA
>> usually sucks too badly to even talk about...
>
> Eh? It cannot be worse than PATA drives now can it?
> _______________________________________________
Probably not, but is SATA really much worse then SCSI or SAS? I did
some testing on a dell PE 2950 of 750GB SATA's vs SAS and SCSI drives,
and the SATA drives seem to be faster at least at first glance. I don't
have good numbers from the SCSI tests, but at least for sequantial, I'm
getting a better speed off the SATAs.
Russ
More information about the CentOS
mailing list